Wear OS 3 isn’t saving Google’s smartwatch platform yet… and CES 2022 just proved that

There’s still hope, but it’s dimming

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.

It’s fair to say that Wear OS hasn’t taken off in the wayApple’swatchOShas, and that’s despite far more people having phones that are compatible with these smartwatches.

But in 2021 we saw some hope for the platform, withGoogleannouncing that it had collaborated withSamsungto totally overhaul theoperating systemin a new version dubbedWear OS 3.

And the fruits of that labor? Well, not much so far, and that’s never been clearer than postCES 2022.

You see, CES is a prime time for smartwatches to be unveiled, yet at CES 2022 we saw very few, and in terms of ones running Wear OS, all we really saw was Fossil’sSkagen Falster Gen 6, and the Razer x Fossil Gen 6– which is basically just aFossil Gen 6withRazertrimmings.

So it’s hardly been a big showing for Wear OS smartwatches, suggesting that Wear OS 3 might not be the savior we hoped it would be – at least not yet.

CES 2023 might have a bigger showing

CES 2023 might have a bigger showing

While it’s a worrying sign that there weren’t more smartwatches at CES 2022, that doesn’t necessarily mean that Wear OS 3 won’t be a big draw in future – such as at CES 2023.

For one thing, outside of theSamsung Galaxy Watch 4range, Wear OS 3 hasn’t actually shipped yet, so wearables announced now are likely either to arrive running Wear OS 2 (with a software update to Wear OS 3 later in the year), or to not actually go on sale for quite a while.

Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.

Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.

Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.

So it’s entirely possible that companies are waiting until they can actually ship devices with Wear OS 3 before announcing them.

Some brands might also want to wait longer than that – to see how popular smartwatches with Wear OS 3 actually prove before committing to building one themselves. They might even want to wait and see how well Google supports the platform, as it’s often let Wear OS feel a little neglected.

So Wear OS 3 could still be a big deal, it just isn’t yet. If Fossil’s watches prove popular, and if theGoogle Pixel Watchfinally lands and sells well, then Google’s smartwatch platform could start to look in much better shape.

Of course, by then these holdouts will have a whole lot more competition if they do choose to jump on board.

An uphill battle

While there’s still hope for Wear OS then, this CES showing has dimmed it somewhat, as without more brands jumping on board and launching exciting big-name wearables running the software, the Wear OS scene could seem like business as usual for would-be buyers.

Will they really be tempted by a handful of familiar sounding watches that just have a new number at the end of both the hardware and software names? We’re not so sure. And if they’re not, then other brands won’t be incentivized to get involved. So it’s a bit of a Catch-22.

TheGoogle Pixel Watchcould be the solution here. This is Google’s chance to show Wear OS 3 as it was intended, but that still needs to translate into sales, and if the Pixel phone range is anything to go by that’s far from guaranteed.

James is a freelance phones, tablets and wearables writer and sub-editor at TechRadar. He has a love for everything ‘smart’, from watches to lights, and can often be found arguing with AI assistants or drowning in the latest apps. James also contributes to 3G.co.uk, 4G.co.uk and 5G.co.uk and has written for T3, Digital Camera World, Clarity Media and others, with work on the web, in print and on TV.

Get the Fitbit Versa 4 for a record-low price at Amazon ahead of Black Friday

The Samsung Galaxy Ring 2 could launch sooner than expected – with new features and a thinner design

Another reason to avoid edge-lit 4K TVs: they may fail faster than others, according to this report