VPN provider sued by top movie studios over no log policy

LiquidVPN has taken down its website, though the service continues to function

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.

A group of movie production companies are suingLiquidVPNfor $10 million over its marketing efforts that the studios claim could be perceived as promoting piracy.

While LiquidVPN’s features aren’t any different from that of any other no-logsVPN provider, the real problem appears to stem from its aggressive marketing strategy.

While LiquidVPN’s website has since been pulled from the internet, it can be accessed through theWayback Machine, and reveals how the service flirted with the boundaries of the law.

We’re looking at how our readers use VPNs with streaming sites like Netflix so we can improve our content and offer better advice. This survey won’t take more than 60 seconds of your time, and we’d hugely appreciate if you’d share your experiences with us.

Click here to start the survey in a new window«

LiquidVPN described itself as “the best VPN for torrenting,” which users could use to “unblock ISP banned streams,” which are otherwise blocked in response to copyright takedown requests.

Aggressive marketing

LiquidVPN didn’t shy away from encouraging its users to access Popcorn Time streams. Think of Popcorn Time as a bittorrent client with an integrated video player. The service and its various apps aren’t legal in several jurisdictions.

On top of that, LiquidVPN advertised the fact that being a no-logs provider, it couldn’t identify and forward DMCA notices to any of its copyright-abusing customers.

Earlier this year in March, thestudios sued LiquidVPNasking for the maximum statutory damage amount of $9,900,000 for the 66 copyrighted works listed in their complaint.

Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!

Despite the fact that VPN providers don’t actually host any copyrighted content, the group is demanding $1,650,000 for “secondary liability” for violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

The studios are now asking the court to issue a default judgment against LiquidVPN for its failure to show up in court.

ViaArs Technica

With almost two decades of writing and reporting on Linux, Mayank Sharma would like everyone to think he’sTechRadar Pro’sexpert on the topic. Of course, he’s just as interested in other computing topics, particularly cybersecurity, cloud, containers, and coding.

Should your VPN always be on?

3 reasons why PIA fell in our best VPN rankings

Smeg Combi Steam Oven review: a multi-functional countertop oven that looks stunning and cooks well